11 February 2009


a daily copy of the los angeles times is seventy-five cents now, and apparently it's been that way since january 13th. the fuck? fifty cents was too much to pay for that shit. honestly guys just find a starbucks or a newsstand, add two quarters to that, and get a new york times.

i love my city and i'm full of civic pride despite all the haters, but the los angeles times is one thing i can NOT get down with. the reporting and the photography are so uninteresting and childish compared to thenew york times. los angeles, for a city of its size and supposed importance, should have a better civic newspaper, because that shit is not cutting it. and the constant drops in readership show it.

No comments:

Post a Comment